How to challenge the evidence in a criminal case: What you need to know

How to challenge the evidence in a criminal case: What you need to know

If you have any criminal-defense-related questions, call us today at (619) 746-8879

In the courtroom, evidence is critical, serving as the bridge connecting the accused to the alleged crime. However, its validity and how it links to the defendant is not always clear cut. Therefore, challenging evidence becomes an imperative part of any criminal case. 

Understanding The Types of Evidence

Before we delve into methods of challenging evidence, we must understand its types. Evidence can broadly be divided into:

• Real / Physical Evidence: Includes any material objects connected to the crime.
• Circumstantial Evidence: Points towards a fact by inference, like the defendant being near a crime scene when it happened.
• Testimonial evidence: It’s a statement made under oath by a witness.

The Importance of Challenging Evidence

Challenging evidence is vital for various reasons. Most crucially, it can affect the defendant’s rights and the trial’s outcome. By questioning the evidence, one could potentially remove the linking factor, potentially tipping the scales in favor of the defendant.

Ways to Challenge Evidence in a Criminal Case

Below are a few ways to challenge the evidence in a criminal case:

1. Challenge the Validity of the Evidence

One efficient way to dispute the evidence is by displaying inconsistencies or false circumstances surrounding it. In such conditions, the evidence may be deemed inadmissible.

2. Prove Tampering or Misconduct

Another beneficial strategy is to indicate signs of tampering or misconduct in the evidence-collection process. One must, however, conclusively show that the evidence has been tampered with or the collection was mishandled.

3. Challenge the Manner the Evidence was Obtained

The legality of how the evidence was obtained is also a matter of paramount importance. If it was collected contrary to legal stipulations, then it could be challenged.

Case Studies

To understand the process better, let’s consider an example where the evidence was successfully challenged.

In a hypothetical case, an individual is charged with theft. The key piece of evidence is CCTV footage showing the accused near the crime scene. However, the defense attorney challenges the evidence’s validity, stating that the accused merely resembles the perpetrator seen in the footage, and there is no direct evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. Hence, challenging the circumstantial evidence successfully leads to the case’s dismissal.

Conclusion

Challenging evidence is an important part of any criminal case. Not only does it offer a chance to preserve the rights of the defendant, but it also ensures the trial’s integrity and fairness, contributing to a fair and just criminal trial.

In any legal situation, always consult an experienced legal advisor, such as a criminal defense lawyer. The need to challenge evidence in a criminal case is crucial, and its impact on the outcome emphasizes the importance of having competent legal advice.

Contact Kannan Law for information about the many ways we can help you.